DEA Confirms Legal Status of Magic Mushroom Spores
It has become a bit of a parlor game for lawyers to contact the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and request its position on the legal status of various compounds. Most recently, attorney Michael McGuire of New York Cultivation Law PLLC contacted the DEA to request the “control status” of “magic mushroom spores” under the CSA. In a response dated January 2, 2024, (full letter below), the DEA states:
“If the mushroom spores (or any other material) do not contain psilocybin or psilocin (or any other controlled substance or listed chemical), the material is considered not controlled under the CSA. However, if at any time the material contains a controlled substance such as psilocybin or psilocin (for example, upon germination), the material would be considered a controlled substance under the CSA.“
On one level, this is fairly uncontroversial. “Magic Mushrooms” (the term used by the DEA) are not scheduled in the CSA. Rather, two of the compounds they produce, psilocybin and psilocin, are scheduled. Since the spores do not contain these compounds, they are not controlled. On another level, however, this is groundbreaking. The legal status of spores has been hotly contested over the years, and people have been convicted of crimes for selling and using spore kits. Getting a clear position on the control status of Magic Mushroom spores by the DEA will certainly ramp up their distribution. That being said, the DEA did not give a clear green light to the sale of spore kits.
Rod Kight is an international cannabis lawyer. He represents businesses throughout the cannabis industry. Additionally, Rod speaks at cannabis conferences, drafts and presents legislation to foreign governments, is regularly quoted on cannabis matters in the media, and is the editor of the Kight on Cannabis legal blog, which discusses legal issues affecting the cannabis industry. You can contact him by clicking here.
Sounds like it would be hard to prosecute for selling spore kits, especially with a strict liability approach to possession. Real question is whether the business selling spores could fight a warrant requesting records of everyone they have sold to and go after people growing. Thoughts?
BTW Rod, your name is coming up a lot in Tennessee hemp circles recently, feel free to give me a call or email if you have any questions about what is going on.
(I’m one of the hemp lawyers in TN and you were on my podcast when I was in law school)
Best,
Jesse
Jesse- Thanks for reading and commenting. First, I remember you and your podcast well and am glad to hear that you are practicing hemp law in TN now. Second, I agree with you about the warrants. The answer likely depends on the specific circumstances, but everyone reading this thread should definitely contact a lawyer immediately if they receive a warrant and/or subpoena. -Rod
DEA’s recent clarification on magic mushroom spores sheds light on their legal status. While spores without psilocybin or psilocin aren’t controlled, caution is advised in marketing and use. Thanks to the blog writer for untangling the legal nuances.
Thank you for the nice summary. -Rod